Showing posts with label Christian Worldview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian Worldview. Show all posts

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Christian Objections to Trump

 

Christian Objections to Trump

Trump is a very polarizing figure.  It seems that either people love him or hate him, with few people on the fence.  I've found it interesting that one demographic with mixed emotions is conservative, evangelical Christians.  This group has little in common with the progressive liberal agenda, which is actively opposed to traditional values and a Christian worldview.  But despite sharing many economic, voting integrity, morality, parental rights, and safety issues with conservatives, some are either actively opposed to Trump, or at least are ambivalent.  What drives this?  Why is this group often among the lower voter turnout demographics? 


Objections and Contrasts


Trump isn't a Christian

  • Honestly, that may be true, but there are few, if any, committed followers of Christ that have been presidents in the last century.  Some have suggested that perhaps he is a young, immature Christian, or is on a journey toward Christ, like Jordan Peterson.  Regardless, we really are not electing a spiritual leader, and we should be looking for a candidate who shares our view of America, who will fight to preserve our rights and freedoms, and who will not be actively hostile to our values. 
  • For me, it matters most who best aligns with the Judeo-Christian worldview of the Founders, and who will support conservative values in the culture wars.  Personally, I would vote for a non-Christian (e.g. a Hindu or Mormon) with whom I share values (but not theology), rather than someone whose party supports socialism, environmental worship, immorality, and the destruction of the nuclear family.

Trump is mean and insults people

  • He makes mean, vicious tweets, often in ALL CAPS.
  • He talks like a New Yorker, with rough language and personal attacks.  He speaks his mind, sometimes unfiltered, but you know where he really stands.  
  • Rhetoric and ridicule are powerful tactics in debate and politics.  Perception is often more valuable than reality, and that is why a one-sided media is so dangerous.  Is exposing ridiculous stands by assigning "labels" really a terrible thing?  How about constantly misrepresenting a person and their character with unproven assertions and mischaracterizations like the Democrat supporters constantly do?
  • And even if aspects of his personality greatly offend you, how is he really any different than many others in the media and political power?  How should that be a deciding factor in voting decisions?  Should feelings trump policy and results?

Trump lies

  • See my perspective on the difference between truth, lies, rhetoric, and opinions here.
  • All politicians spin records, positions, the economy, and world events to their advantage.  Often it is from their perspective, and it is really disingenuous to claim that these are always "lies".  Perhaps in some cases they may actually be factually inaccurate and deliberate distortions of the truth, but far more often they are perspectives on larger issues that require more than just sound-bites.
  • I find it hard to swallow that an unbiased person can rake Trump over the coals for his campaign rhetoric, while giving a pass to the other side, which in many ways is far more egregious.  According to his critics he is worse than Hitler, a threat to democracy, will take away women's rights, and is racist and anti-Semitic.  Seems like that justifies anything to the Left, including assassination!

Trump won't admit defeat

  • Yes, given the way that the election was run and votes tallied, Joe Biden was elected President.  
  • There are legitimate reasons to question the validity of the outcome, though, when there were numerous irregularities that abounded.  Would these have made a difference in the outcome?  We'll never know, because it has become taboo to even question election integrity issues.  Did the media interfere in the election by failing to cover/expose/deny inconvenient truths?  What impact did last minute (possibly illegal) changes to voting methods in various states have?  What is wrong with demanding only eligible citizens get to vote, requiring voter id, and proof of citizenship?
  • Note: Virtually every national election in recent years has been challenged by the losers, many times by the Democrats.
  • Do you want a leader who will quit and give up, or someone who will keep trying to win?  I think we saw that spirit in Trump right after an assassin came close to taking his life because of the hatred toward him and what he represents.  Do you want a leader who will stand up for what is right to other world leaders, or to be a puppet of a political oligarchy?

Trump is a woman hater and abuser

  • Was Trump basically a super-rich playboy who enjoyed his fame, power, and fortune?  Of course!  Did he always live a virtuous and morally pure life?  Seems not likely, but also be careful with blindly believing past accusations.  Has he continued this way of life, or has he changed?  I'd argue that his recent track record shows change.  As scripture says, we need to make fair and unhypocritical judgments.    
  • Held to the same standards, many current politicians (including presidents and hopefuls) look to be guilty of taking bribes, influence peddling, adultery with wives of staffers, political careers started by affairs with older men, credible rape allegations, DEI discrimination against the most qualified, and even inappropriate showering with children.  Who has raised their children well, and who has crack and sex addicted ones?  I think that says a lot about their parenting and character, don't you? 
  • Do current candidates (and their parties) have an active disdain for traditional sexual morality, or do they champion moral perversions in the name of diversity and pride? 

Trump will be a dictator and is a threat to Democracy

  • Really?  How did you come to that conclusion?  Is he a threat to democracy, or a threat to their power and control?
  • Trump was President for 4 years.  During that time, what did he do that could be called dictatorial?  Democracy clearly didn't die.  He was a leader, and leaders make hard decisions.  The implication by the Left is that now it will be different because he said, "I'll be a dictator on Day One!"  Of course, just like the Charlottesville claim that he said that white supremacists were good people, this is also a deliberate distortion (i.e. "a lie").  What he said is that he will "be a dictator" and immediately reverse all of Biden's unwise executive orders ASAP.  If making executive orders makes one a dictator, then you need to convict them all.

Trump is divisive and polarizing

  • It is claimed that he is polarizing and divisive, as if that is necessarily a bad thing.  Many great leaders have been, and forced people to pick a side (e.g. Jesus, Lincoln).  Maybe it is a time to take a stand and not just go with the establishment party leadership.  
  • And "C'mon man," the constant stream of propaganda from the mainstream media and progressive politicians isn't?  They constantly try to divide us along DEI lines: race, sexuality, oppressed status, identity, and more.  They teach our kids to be ashamed of who they are because their skin color is different than others.  They tell us that their opposition is so evil that we must silence and destroy them.   

Trump will seek revenge

  • Trump has been unbelievably targeted by unjust attacks both during office and in the years since.  He has been impeached for ridiculous reasons, assigned blame for a riot where he clearly called for peaceful protest by patriotic Americans, persecuted with lawfare and farcical over-charging of "novel" crimes, and constantly smeared by the media when he tries to defend his policies and actions.
  • Yet, what indication is there that he will "seek revenge"?  I suspect that the Democrats are shaking in their boots because they know what they did to him, and fear that once the shoe is on the other foot, that they are next.  Maybe that will happen, or maybe not.  Sometimes the only way to stop a bully is to make them feel real consequences for their actions.  As an example, did Trump "lock her up" after the election for Hillary's crimes of destruction of evidence?  The evidence was there, but no, he didn't. 
  • This claim is just a big red-herring and has no basis in fact.  Just a scare tactic like claiming that granny will be thrown over the medicare/welfare cliff if the other party is elected.

Trump has a big ego and is not humble

  • I tend to agree with this and personally feel like this is something he needs to work on.  However, is this really a disqualifying characteristic?  I don't know many individuals who are at the top of their respective fields that don't have some level of pride in themselves.  Can that be a bad thing?  Yes, if not tempered.
  • Related to this are claims that he doesn't have empathy.  Where did that idea come from except the Democrats and their media?  Supporting policies that you disagree with, such as deportations, doesn't mean he has no empathy.  Since when is expecting enforcement of our laws and justice in prosecution mean?  In fact, he cares deeply about the safety and welfare of the American people first.  His interactions with victims of crimes and disasters seems to be very genuine, so on what basis do you claim that it is faked?    
  • Again I would ask that this be fairly applied when you are making critical judgments.

 Trump is not 100% Pro-life

  • Trump appears to be a pragmatist on abortion, at this point, in a highly divided country.  While he agrees that abortion is a terrible thing, he realizes that you have to win elections to impact policy.  His position appears to be in support of state-level restrictions on most abortions, except in the cases of rape, mother's life, and very early week pregnancies.  
  • As a Christian, I personally feel that abortion is wrong in almost every circumstance, except in rare cases where it is really needed to save the mother's life.  Yes, carrying a baby to term is a burden, perhaps even an involuntary one, but killing an innocent baby is far worse.  But, I would rather compromise and ban most abortions, even if it means some still happen, rather than being a political absolutist and end up with all abortions being legal with no restrictions.  Start somewhere first, and then work towards better laws.  Sometimes the "all or nothing" approach is actually the worst choice morally.
  • He did appoint conservative justices to the Supreme Court that overturned the terrible Roe vs. Wade ruling, thus returning the power to the States.  He agrees with this ruling and that it is best left to the individual states to decide how they want to regulate it. 

Trump takes credit for the COVID vaccine

  • In the midst of the pandemic, as President, he facilitated the development of a vaccine.  He often has taken credit for getting this done rapidly.  It seems that he may have gotten bad advice from some people on this, but in the heat of the moment, it may not be fair to be too judgmental.  Can we really say that he knowingly pushed a harmful vaccine out to the public, especially when he was being advised that it would save millions of lives?
  • While he never forced vaccinations, as Biden did, he did encourage people to take it.  Whether it ultimately saved lives may be questioned by some.  Clearly, it was a rapid development, with insufficient testing prior to release.  There were significant side-effects for some, especially in the young, who generally had the least risk from the disease.  While it is controversial, I cannot fault high-risk people for taking it when recommended by their trusted doctors, right or wrong, and it is wrong to demonize them.
  • Remember which president completely locked down the country and schools, forced masking, and mandated vaccinations on pain of termination.

Trump is a racist and anti-Semite

  • Let's see -- he has immediate family members who are Jewish and was the best Presidential supporter of Israel ever.  Yep, that has to be anti-Semitic.
  • Does being anti-illegal immigration make him racist?  Do repeated out of context quotes about supporting white supremacy make it so? 
  • Does defunding and sanctioning terrorist states and groups make him an Islamophobe too?
  • How in the world did you ever come to the conclusion that he is a racist?  Oh, by listening to the liberal progressives and their mainstream media outlets!?!  Shame on you for trusting them!

Trump hates immigrants

  • Understanding that uncontrolled illegal immigration is harmful to our country and wishing to see it fixed is hardly hatred.  If anything, this is compassion and love of OUR COUNTRY.  
  • Putting restrictions or halts to the massive influx of illegal border crossings is a good thing.  As is enforcing our asylum laws and regulations as intended, without the perversion of letting them be used to let most crossers to stay indefinitely.
  • Some claim that this Nationalism is antithetical to Christian values.  But it is a liberal distortion of Christianity to claim that concerns about the oppressed, refugees and illegal migrants, and even the environment must take priority over responsibilities to care for our own people first.  As I previously noted, a sinking life raft can't save anyone.
  • Finding humane ways to deport people is not cruel, but it is just.  Perhaps disincentivizing employers with tax consequences for hiring illegal employees would put pressure on them to return.  Rewarding unlawful entry and identity theft with permanent status, and free welfare, healthcare, and lifestyle support does nothing to fix the situation, but rather makes it worse both now and in the long run. 

The Takeaway

Voting for the progressive liberals, or just not voting at all, will be a disaster for our country in terms of the continued lurch away from traditional values, destruction of our economic systems, and the division of our country along racial and progressive CRT ideology.  If your personal hatred of Trump extends that far, then I suppose you will get what you deserve, at the expense of the rest of us.  

Instead of voting for those holding to values antithetical to the Christian Worldview, why not ... ?
  • Vote for our constitutional freedoms. 
  • Vote for Supreme Court Justices who will faithfully uphold the Constitution.  
  • Vote for a better economy.  
  • Vote for voter integrity and not mob democracy.  
  • Vote for law, order, and safety by supporting the police and military.  
  • Vote for secure borders and less trafficking and drugs.  
  • Vote against endless foreign wars.  
  • Vote for protecting our freedoms from censorship and against suppression of free speech.  
  • Vote for all human life, regardless of arbitrary categories, including the unborn.  
  • Vote for Equality over Equity, Color-blindness over CRT glasses, and Real Justice over Social Justice.
God help us restore our country!

Sunday, July 14, 2024

Truth Month - July 2024 - Day 14 - All people have dignity and worth, but not all actions and beliefs are true or good

 

Truth Month - July 2024


Day 14 -  All people have dignity and worth, but not all actions and beliefs are true or good.

Most people would agree that all people have dignity and worth.  The Christian worldview grounds this belief in the fact that we are created in the Image of God, and thus have inherent value.  However, it is a fallacy to assume that because of this status, criticizing the actions of a person or challenging their deeply held beliefs is out of bounds.


So what is good or evil?  Intuitively, we know that all beliefs and cultures are not necessarily good or true, or at least some are better than others (e.g. cannibalism, torture of babies).  But only a worldview that holds to objective morality has the grounding to justify calling something good or evil, right or wrong.  Cultures that hold to relativistic morality lose the ability to fairly criticize others, since they have no objective basis to claim their views are morally superior.  In fact, relativism results in moral claims becoming just preferences (e.g. "I don't like that").  


For example, given relativistic morality, one can't claim that slavery is actually wrong, since slave owners can just as easily claim that it is right.  The most that can be claimed is "I believe that you are wrong and I'd prefer that you don't do it".  The problem is that we all actually have a moral intuition that tells us that it is wrong.  The Christian worldview explains this insight as a reflection of the Image of God in all of us.  Relativism fails to have that explanatory power.


Saturday, July 13, 2024

Truth Month - July 2024 - Day 13 - All Truth is God's Truth

 

Truth Month - July 2024


Day 13 - All Truth is God's Truth

Truth is what corresponds to reality.  It is not about what we feel, or determined by strongly held convictions.  The foundational truth is that God cannot lie and that He is the author of all Truth.  He can never contradict Himself, since He is the immutably good, all powerful, and necessary being.


Christians have often struggled with change.  The enlightenment which fostered the scientific revolution has been hard for some to accept, especially when there are apparent discrepancies between the Words of Scripture and the discoveries of modern science.  Who do we believe and where do we place our trust?  Do we really have to choose between believing in God and facts discovered by the scientific method?


Fortunately, there is a third option — the realization that "All Truth is God's Truth."   The God who created the whole natural realm and then chose to reveal Himself to us cannot, and will not, deceive us or communicate falsehoods.  God did not give us evidence of a past history that never happened, nor did He give His revelation to mislead us into believing falsehoods.  


Historically, Christians have held to a concept called "dual revelation", or the two Books view, which is well articulated by the Belgic Confession of 1561: 


We know him by two means: first, by the creation, preservation and government of the universe; which is before our eyes as a most elegant book, wherein all creatures, great and small, are as so many characters leading us to contemplate the invisible things of God, namely, his power and divinity, as the apostle Paul saith, Romans 1:20. All which things are sufficient to convince men, and leave them without excuse. Secondly, he makes himself more clearly and fully known to us by his holy and divine Word, that is to say, as far as is necessary for us to know in this life, to his glory and our salvation.


Because both revelations come from the Creator God, there can be no inherent conflict between truths found in each.  However, we need to be humble enough to realize that, as human beings, we can misinterpret one or both, and force a seeming conflict or contradiction.  Also, it is possible that we simply don't yet fully understand portions well enough to be dogmatic about certain particulars.  


The TLDR bottom line is this:  We do not have to choose between having a love for studying the amazing creation that God has given us and loving God with all our hearts and minds.  


Tuesday, July 9, 2024

Truth Month - July 2024 - Day 9 - When the moral foundation of a culture crumbles, it is inevitable that evil will prosper

 

Truth Month - July 2024


Day 9 - When the moral foundation of a culture crumbles, it is inevitable that evil will prosper

There have been many examinations of why Rome fell, but many have attributed "moral decay" to its downfall.  Especially near the end, decreasing safety, sexual promiscuity, lavish overindulgent parties, and violence had greatly increased.  Is it possible that we have headed down that same road?


The United States of America was uniquely founded upon the Judeo-Christian moral ethic.  While not all of the Founders were Christians, they almost universally held to the morality found in the Christian bible.  There was common agreement about belief in the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman, of the value of human life as being created in the image of God, the good of working to earn a living and the right to keep what you earn and create, to not take or steal what belongs to others, to have just laws and have them applied impartially, and an understanding that there is objective right and wrong - good and evil.  They based our constitutional republic on the underlying foundation provided by the Ten Commandments and other biblical principles.


It is apparent to many that our nation has strayed from these core principles.  No longer do we hold there are self-evident truths that determine what is right and wrong.  Instead, now "my truth" and "lived experience" is given more weight in modern culture and political realms.  The sexual revolution keeps expanding to more extremes than was imagined possible just a short time ago.  We sacrifice the young, innocent, and unborn on the altars of diversity and convenience.  Justice is perverted, where the guilty are not punished but encouraged, while others are targeted for prosecution because of their beliefs.  Equity of outcomes is now touted as fairness, instead of giving equal opportunity, which also comes with the expectation of hard work and no guarantees.  Lifetime politicians enrich themselves and gather power.  Established religions are denigrated, while any other form of spirituality is encouraged.  Moral relativism has removed the grounding of right and wrong to the extent that things previously known to be evil are now permitted and promoted as good.


There truly is a culture war that is being waged, and the consequences to the corporate soul of our nation are dire.  Will evil continue to prosper until the inevitable fall, or will there be a revival in the hearts of the people?  Time will tell.


Thursday, July 4, 2024

Truth Month - July 2024 - Day 4 - Men and Women are made in the Image of God but marred by sin

 

Truth Month - July 2024


Day 4 - Men and Women are made in the Image of God, but marred by sin

The great mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal pondered the seeming paradox that human beings exhibit qualities of both greatness and wretchedness.  What worldview best explains this enigma?  Are humans basically good, but sometimes do bad things?  Or is there a more fundamental problem at the root of it?  Are we just products of untold ages of unguided evolution, molded by the struggle to survive?  Is there more to life?  Is there purpose in life beyond something we give ourselves?


I believe that Christianity has the best explanation for this dilemma.  From the beginning, God created mankind in His own image, as complementarian male and female beings.  While we are not God (or gods), we bear a likeness to Him.  But now the rest of the story… that image has been marred and distorted by our disobedience and rebellion against the Creator's design (i.e. "sin").  That is the tension that we all war with our whole lives.  Even the apostle Paul struggled to do what he knew to be right, when he wanted to do otherwise.  


What is the image of God (or the Imago Dei in Latin)?  The Bible never explicitly says what this is, but reading the whole thing gives us some insights.  Here are three (nonexclusive) ways to understand the image of God.  

  1. Resemblance - We look like God in some ways.  We bear a likeness by sharing some of His communicable characteristics, such as love, intelligence, moral awareness, and creativity.

  2. Representative Ruler - We are meant to be God's representatives on Earth, with the power to rule over the earth and subdue it.  We also are tasked with sharing the revelation and knowledge of God to others.

  3. Relational - We have a relational nature between ourselves and others, just as the triune God has loving relationships between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  Because of this, we are also capable of having a relationship with our Creator.


God chose not to leave us to wallow in our sin, but rather provided a way to be reconciled to Himself.  Jesus became a man, lived among us, was brutally executed, and then rose again.  His sacrifice paid the price of our debt and took the punishment in our place, so that we can have a new start and be conformed to His image once again. 

 


Tuesday, July 2, 2024

Truth Month - July 2024 - Day 2 - God Keeps His Promises

 

Truth Month - July 2024


Day 2

God Keeps His Promises.

One of the great promises of God is that He will never again send a universal flood to purge the earth of a reprobate humanity.  He gave us the sign of the rainbow as a reminder of His promise.  Despite efforts to repurpose this awesome display, it remains today as a visual reminder that God is faithful.  For those who love and follow God, he has promised that ultimately all things will work for good and not evil (Romans 8:28).  


Trust needs to be earned.  We all have experienced broken promises from people and groups we have trusted.  Sometimes it is hard to recover from the moral failures of others that directly impact our lives.  Our heroes may fail; vows broken by us and to us; our security and safety violated.  We sometimes even fail ourselves.  We all need someone to put our trust in who will not fail us.  As revealed in the Bible, God has a 100% track record of keeping his promises.  


Just a quick note on biblical promises.  We must be very careful not to claim promises that God has given to others as our own.  While often there are principles from examples in the Bible that may be generally applicable, it is also very easy to improperly claim some promises as our own.  This can be avoided by carefully looking at the context of the text and by applying the principle of Never read a Bible verse. For example, “As a man thinks in his heart, so he is” (Prov. 23:7) is not a promise that whatever you truly believe will become reality for you.  Likewise, Jeremiah 29:11 simply reads, “‘For I know the plans that I have for you,’ declares the Lord, ‘plans for welfare and not for calamity to give you a future and a hope.’” This was given at a specific time to a specific group of people, but unfortunately it is not a personal promise made to you!   


I'll leave you with these promises from God's Word.

  

That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved (Romans 10:9) 


In My Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also. And where I go you know, and the way you know.” Thomas said to Him, “Lord, we do not know where You are going, and how can we know the way?” Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. (John 14:2-6)


Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new. (2 Corinthians 5:17) 


Friday, February 16, 2024

Ministry of Truth Timely Update - 16 Feb 2024 - Sacrificial Co-laboring

 

Sacrificial Co-laboring

Even though stories of Jesus claim that he was a servant leader, that is a misinterpretation, since "service" has a negative connotation that may offend those on the receiving end.  Instead, it is clear that he was a sacrificial co-laborer, and as such, his followers must not fall into the oppressor's trap of calling for "service" to the needy.  Service "may invoke power dynamics across socio-economic, racial, and cultural lines," so even formerly religious schools must eschew the existence of an unbalanced power dynamic in their interactions with their fellow humans – like the social justice warrior Jesus.

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 19 Dec 2023 - Gender

 

Gender

Postmodern thought often requires words to be redefined to match the current zeitgeist.  For example, "gender" has now been deconstructed to better reflect the current views of the Ministry of Truth.  Whereas the old Objective truth views held gender to be grounded in biological sex, this has been replaced by the Subjective view of gender expression.  This better reflects the lived reality and spectrum of feelings found in modern society, instead of being grounded in inflexible definitions that no longer serve the progressive transformation of society.  To protect society from their contagion, those who insist on using the obsolete definitions will be punished for their thoughtcrime.

More info:    

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Friday, September 22, 2023

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 22 Sep 2023 - The Lord's Prayer

 

The Lord's Prayer

The Jewish teacher, Jesus, mistakenly misgendered God when he taught his patriarchal followers to pray to "Our Father". This is problematic and divisive, especially for those whose experience of earthly fathers has been destructive and abusive, and for all those who have suffered from an oppressively patriarchal grip on life.  Progressive religious leaders need to take their cues from culture, rather than from old human writings or unenlightened ancient teachers.

More info:  

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Wednesday, September 13, 2023

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 13 Sep 2023 - Opt-out

 

Opt-out

There is a compelling governmental interest in refusing to allow misguided parents to choose which Ministry of Truth social training sessions their children attend.  Exposing children to these books, and to appropriate sexual content, does not undermine sacred parental authority, nor does it force religious parents to abandon what they believe their faiths teach or practice, hence it is in line with the "free exercise" clause guidelines.  Of course, classroom exposure to ancient Abrahamic religions (and their questionable values) is forbidden, since it can cause great distress and harm to children in their morally formative years, and could lead to proselytizing, indoctrination, and child abuse.

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Tuesday, April 11, 2023

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 11 Apr 2023 - No Kill Policies

 

No Kill Policies

It is extremely heartless to allow animal shelters (or mills) to kill innocent, unwanted animals, when there are so many people willing to adopt and care for them.  We can end the cycle of non-human births, homelessness, and deaths, but we must address the root cause instead of flailing in the water, pulling out one kitten at a time while so many others float by, and screaming that others in the water with us aren’t saving enough of them.  We should care about our fellow sentient beings because they have inherent dignity and worth.  Of course, this is reserved exclusively for non-humans, since humanity is a plague on the planet and population reductions are necessary for Mother Earth to thrive.

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Thursday, September 9, 2021

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 09 Sep 2021 - Pro-Abortion Churches

 

Pro-Abortion Churches

Ministry of Truth approved religious organizations that prioritize enabling women to have unborn babies killed without guilt, that are politically active for approved causes, and that minimize faithfulness to outdated holy texts written by controlling men. 

More info:  

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Friday, April 2, 2021

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 02 Apr 2021 - Judgment

 

Judgment

To weigh a person's character by the Ministry's external social categories, not by the content of their heart.

more info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Sunday, February 28, 2021