Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 22 Apr 2025 - Panican

 

Panican

Members of a growing political party or movement who firmly resist change and panic if they receive any criticism.  The Panican comes in both Red and Blue varieties, with some shades of Purple as well.  Panicans are known by their focus on keeping power by winning the next elections, rather than making hard choices, seeing the big picture, and generally adulting.  
Don't be weak or stupid!  Don't be a Panican! 

More info: 

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Thursday, March 20, 2025

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 20 Mar 2025 - Neutered Truth

 

Neutered Truth

Neutered Truth = To counter POTUS's so-called "truths", congressional disruptors are determined to "speak lies to his truth" (i.e. "True Lies").  His false truths include:
  • Children are perfect just the way God made them !
  • Men competing in women's sports is really unfair !
  • Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in government spending should be eliminated !
As the electorally retired former Big Brother said, we should "choose (our) truth over facts".


More info: 

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Monday, January 13, 2025

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 13 Jan 2025 - Authenticity

 

Authenticity

Being true to your unchanging internal values, while crafting messages for the best audience response.  Being too open about your real self is a liability, since you could be pinned down to specific beliefs and values, so be guarded.  Besides, a politician comes across as boring if they are always seen as the same.  

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Saturday, September 21, 2024

Ministry of Truth Timely Update - 21 Sep 2024 - Bring Down the Temperature

 

Bring Down the Temperature

The former dictator and opposition candidate is the root cause of political violence due to his inflammatory rhetoric.  This Hitleresque clone is an existential threat to the very foundations of our democracy, and is 
  • dangerous and divisive, 
  • a traitor and civil war plotter,
  • an extremist, 
  • an inciter of violence, 
  • a racist and hater of minorities, 
  • a denier of all (scientific) truth, 
  • a climate destroyer, 
  • the taker of fundamental freedoms and rights, 
  • a friend to dictators and international pariah, 
  • a threat to the soul of our nation and everything we stand for,
  • against our national interest in the military industrial complex and profitable wars,
  • an instigator of more violence by surviving assassinations, 
  • and … makes mean, insulting tweets!  
The enemy, and his ignorant minions, must lower the temperature of their rhetoric before someone gets hurt.  Violence against us is not acceptable in our country.    

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Thursday, September 5, 2024

Ministry of Truth Timely Update - 05 Sep 2024 - Press-canceling Headphones

 

Press-canceling Headphones

To avoid answering questions from hostile media, unprepared presidential candidates need to wear noise-canceling ear wear so they can wade through reporters while pretending not to hear their questions.  Unconfirmed rumors have it that she was listening to the Leadership for Cowards 101 podcast.

More info: 

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Monday, September 2, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 02 Sep 2024 - Kamalanomenon

 

Kamalanomenon

The meteoric rise in popularity following the official abdication of Big Brother.  This rising star's popularity is so great that social media influencers get paid to promote this formerly unpopular candidate.  By hiding from the press and not talking about the progressive agenda she and her new running mate support, they will surely poll better than their dangerous opponents and former running mate. 

More info: 

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Monday, August 19, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 19 Aug 2024 - Circumlocution

 

Circumlocution

A favorite pastime of many political figures.  The repetitive use of many unnecessarily large and complex words, and indirect speech, to confuse the listener and avoid getting to the point.  This skill is most useful in avoiding answering direct questions or trying not to look unable to answer questions, while appearing to look intelligent by demonstrating linguistic artistry.

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ

Tuesday, August 6, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 06 Aug 2024 - Black-shaming

 

Black-shaming

Just criticism of those who don't vote with their culture based on skin color.  Big Brother claims that, "You ain't black!" if you don't choose wisely to protect diversity by voting for him or his successor of color.  The Ministry of Truth implores, "If you don't vote [with us], then you are letting a racist win."  Voters should be shamed for not voting for the DEI candidate, since policies and principles are less important than "the moment".

More info:  

Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Christian Objections to Trump

 

Christian Objections to Trump

Trump is a very polarizing figure.  It seems that either people love him or hate him, with few people on the fence.  I've found it interesting that one demographic with mixed emotions is conservative, evangelical Christians.  This group has little in common with the progressive liberal agenda, which is actively opposed to traditional values and a Christian worldview.  But despite sharing many economic, voting integrity, morality, parental rights, and safety issues with conservatives, some are either actively opposed to Trump, or at least are ambivalent.  What drives this?  Why is this group often among the lower voter turnout demographics? 


Objections and Contrasts


Trump isn't a Christian

  • Honestly, that may be true, but there are few, if any, committed followers of Christ that have been presidents in the last century.  Some have suggested that perhaps he is a young, immature Christian, or is on a journey toward Christ, like Jordan Peterson.  Regardless, we really are not electing a spiritual leader, and we should be looking for a candidate who shares our view of America, who will fight to preserve our rights and freedoms, and who will not be actively hostile to our values. 
  • For me, it matters most who best aligns with the Judeo-Christian worldview of the Founders, and who will support conservative values in the culture wars.  Personally, I would vote for a non-Christian (e.g. a Hindu or Mormon) with whom I share values (but not theology), rather than someone whose party supports socialism, environmental worship, immorality, and the destruction of the nuclear family.

Trump is mean and insults people

  • He makes mean, vicious tweets, often in ALL CAPS.
  • He talks like a New Yorker, with rough language and personal attacks.  He speaks his mind, sometimes unfiltered, but you know where he really stands.  
  • Rhetoric and ridicule are powerful tactics in debate and politics.  Perception is often more valuable than reality, and that is why a one-sided media is so dangerous.  Is exposing ridiculous stands by assigning "labels" really a terrible thing?  How about constantly misrepresenting a person and their character with unproven assertions and mischaracterizations like the Democrat supporters constantly do?
  • And even if aspects of his personality greatly offend you, how is he really any different than many others in the media and political power?  How should that be a deciding factor in voting decisions?  Should feelings trump policy and results?

Trump lies

  • See my perspective on the difference between truth, lies, rhetoric, and opinions here.
  • All politicians spin records, positions, the economy, and world events to their advantage.  Often it is from their perspective, and it is really disingenuous to claim that these are always "lies".  Perhaps in some cases they may actually be factually inaccurate and deliberate distortions of the truth, but far more often they are perspectives on larger issues that require more than just sound-bites.
  • I find it hard to swallow that an unbiased person can rake Trump over the coals for his campaign rhetoric, while giving a pass to the other side, which in many ways is far more egregious.  According to his critics he is worse than Hitler, a threat to democracy, will take away women's rights, and is racist and anti-Semitic.  Seems like that justifies anything to the Left, including assassination!

Trump won't admit defeat

  • Yes, given the way that the election was run and votes tallied, Joe Biden was elected President.  
  • There are legitimate reasons to question the validity of the outcome, though, when there were numerous irregularities that abounded.  Would these have made a difference in the outcome?  We'll never know, because it has become taboo to even question election integrity issues.  Did the media interfere in the election by failing to cover/expose/deny inconvenient truths?  What impact did last minute (possibly illegal) changes to voting methods in various states have?  What is wrong with demanding only eligible citizens get to vote, requiring voter id, and proof of citizenship?
  • Note: Virtually every national election in recent years has been challenged by the losers, many times by the Democrats.
  • Do you want a leader who will quit and give up, or someone who will keep trying to win?  I think we saw that spirit in Trump right after an assassin came close to taking his life because of the hatred toward him and what he represents.  Do you want a leader who will stand up for what is right to other world leaders, or to be a puppet of a political oligarchy?

Trump is a woman hater and abuser

  • Was Trump basically a super-rich playboy who enjoyed his fame, power, and fortune?  Of course!  Did he always live a virtuous and morally pure life?  Seems not likely, but also be careful with blindly believing past accusations.  Has he continued this way of life, or has he changed?  I'd argue that his recent track record shows change.  As scripture says, we need to make fair and unhypocritical judgments.    
  • Held to the same standards, many current politicians (including presidents and hopefuls) look to be guilty of taking bribes, influence peddling, adultery with wives of staffers, political careers started by affairs with older men, credible rape allegations, DEI discrimination against the most qualified, and even inappropriate showering with children.  Who has raised their children well, and who has crack and sex addicted ones?  I think that says a lot about their parenting and character, don't you? 
  • Do current candidates (and their parties) have an active disdain for traditional sexual morality, or do they champion moral perversions in the name of diversity and pride? 

Trump will be a dictator and is a threat to Democracy

  • Really?  How did you come to that conclusion?  Is he a threat to democracy, or a threat to their power and control?
  • Trump was President for 4 years.  During that time, what did he do that could be called dictatorial?  Democracy clearly didn't die.  He was a leader, and leaders make hard decisions.  The implication by the Left is that now it will be different because he said, "I'll be a dictator on Day One!"  Of course, just like the Charlottesville claim that he said that white supremacists were good people, this is also a deliberate distortion (i.e. "a lie").  What he said is that he will "be a dictator" and immediately reverse all of Biden's unwise executive orders ASAP.  If making executive orders makes one a dictator, then you need to convict them all.

Trump is divisive and polarizing

  • It is claimed that he is polarizing and divisive, as if that is necessarily a bad thing.  Many great leaders have been, and forced people to pick a side (e.g. Jesus, Lincoln).  Maybe it is a time to take a stand and not just go with the establishment party leadership.  
  • And "C'mon man," the constant stream of propaganda from the mainstream media and progressive politicians isn't?  They constantly try to divide us along DEI lines: race, sexuality, oppressed status, identity, and more.  They teach our kids to be ashamed of who they are because their skin color is different than others.  They tell us that their opposition is so evil that we must silence and destroy them.   

Trump will seek revenge

  • Trump has been unbelievably targeted by unjust attacks both during office and in the years since.  He has been impeached for ridiculous reasons, assigned blame for a riot where he clearly called for peaceful protest by patriotic Americans, persecuted with lawfare and farcical over-charging of "novel" crimes, and constantly smeared by the media when he tries to defend his policies and actions.
  • Yet, what indication is there that he will "seek revenge"?  I suspect that the Democrats are shaking in their boots because they know what they did to him, and fear that once the shoe is on the other foot, that they are next.  Maybe that will happen, or maybe not.  Sometimes the only way to stop a bully is to make them feel real consequences for their actions.  As an example, did Trump "lock her up" after the election for Hillary's crimes of destruction of evidence?  The evidence was there, but no, he didn't. 
  • This claim is just a big red-herring and has no basis in fact.  Just a scare tactic like claiming that granny will be thrown over the medicare/welfare cliff if the other party is elected.

Trump has a big ego and is not humble

  • I tend to agree with this and personally feel like this is something he needs to work on.  However, is this really a disqualifying characteristic?  I don't know many individuals who are at the top of their respective fields that don't have some level of pride in themselves.  Can that be a bad thing?  Yes, if not tempered.
  • Related to this are claims that he doesn't have empathy.  Where did that idea come from except the Democrats and their media?  Supporting policies that you disagree with, such as deportations, doesn't mean he has no empathy.  Since when is expecting enforcement of our laws and justice in prosecution mean?  In fact, he cares deeply about the safety and welfare of the American people first.  His interactions with victims of crimes and disasters seems to be very genuine, so on what basis do you claim that it is faked?    
  • Again I would ask that this be fairly applied when you are making critical judgments.

 Trump is not 100% Pro-life

  • Trump appears to be a pragmatist on abortion, at this point, in a highly divided country.  While he agrees that abortion is a terrible thing, he realizes that you have to win elections to impact policy.  His position appears to be in support of state-level restrictions on most abortions, except in the cases of rape, mother's life, and very early week pregnancies.  
  • As a Christian, I personally feel that abortion is wrong in almost every circumstance, except in rare cases where it is really needed to save the mother's life.  Yes, carrying a baby to term is a burden, perhaps even an involuntary one, but killing an innocent baby is far worse.  But, I would rather compromise and ban most abortions, even if it means some still happen, rather than being a political absolutist and end up with all abortions being legal with no restrictions.  Start somewhere first, and then work towards better laws.  Sometimes the "all or nothing" approach is actually the worst choice morally.
  • He did appoint conservative justices to the Supreme Court that overturned the terrible Roe vs. Wade ruling, thus returning the power to the States.  He agrees with this ruling and that it is best left to the individual states to decide how they want to regulate it. 

Trump takes credit for the COVID vaccine

  • In the midst of the pandemic, as President, he facilitated the development of a vaccine.  He often has taken credit for getting this done rapidly.  It seems that he may have gotten bad advice from some people on this, but in the heat of the moment, it may not be fair to be too judgmental.  Can we really say that he knowingly pushed a harmful vaccine out to the public, especially when he was being advised that it would save millions of lives?
  • While he never forced vaccinations, as Biden did, he did encourage people to take it.  Whether it ultimately saved lives may be questioned by some.  Clearly, it was a rapid development, with insufficient testing prior to release.  There were significant side-effects for some, especially in the young, who generally had the least risk from the disease.  While it is controversial, I cannot fault high-risk people for taking it when recommended by their trusted doctors, right or wrong, and it is wrong to demonize them.
  • Remember which president completely locked down the country and schools, forced masking, and mandated vaccinations on pain of termination.

Trump is a racist and anti-Semite

  • Let's see -- he has immediate family members who are Jewish and was the best Presidential supporter of Israel ever.  Yep, that has to be anti-Semitic.
  • Does being anti-illegal immigration make him racist?  Do repeated out of context quotes about supporting white supremacy make it so? 
  • Does defunding and sanctioning terrorist states and groups make him an Islamophobe too?
  • How in the world did you ever come to the conclusion that he is a racist?  Oh, by listening to the liberal progressives and their mainstream media outlets!?!  Shame on you for trusting them!

Trump hates immigrants

  • Understanding that uncontrolled illegal immigration is harmful to our country and wishing to see it fixed is hardly hatred.  If anything, this is compassion and love of OUR COUNTRY.  
  • Putting restrictions or halts to the massive influx of illegal border crossings is a good thing.  As is enforcing our asylum laws and regulations as intended, without the perversion of letting them be used to let most crossers to stay indefinitely.
  • Some claim that this Nationalism is antithetical to Christian values.  But it is a liberal distortion of Christianity to claim that concerns about the oppressed, refugees and illegal migrants, and even the environment must take priority over responsibilities to care for our own people first.  As I previously noted, a sinking life raft can't save anyone.
  • Finding humane ways to deport people is not cruel, but it is just.  Perhaps disincentivizing employers with tax consequences for hiring illegal employees would put pressure on them to return.  Rewarding unlawful entry and identity theft with permanent status, and free welfare, healthcare, and lifestyle support does nothing to fix the situation, but rather makes it worse both now and in the long run. 

The Takeaway

Voting for the progressive liberals, or just not voting at all, will be a disaster for our country in terms of the continued lurch away from traditional values, destruction of our economic systems, and the division of our country along racial and progressive CRT ideology.  If your personal hatred of Trump extends that far, then I suppose you will get what you deserve, at the expense of the rest of us.  

Instead of voting for those holding to values antithetical to the Christian Worldview, why not ... ?
  • Vote for our constitutional freedoms. 
  • Vote for Supreme Court Justices who will faithfully uphold the Constitution.  
  • Vote for a better economy.  
  • Vote for voter integrity and not mob democracy.  
  • Vote for law, order, and safety by supporting the police and military.  
  • Vote for secure borders and less trafficking and drugs.  
  • Vote against endless foreign wars.  
  • Vote for protecting our freedoms from censorship and against suppression of free speech.  
  • Vote for all human life, regardless of arbitrary categories, including the unborn.  
  • Vote for Equality over Equity, Color-blindness over CRT glasses, and Real Justice over Social Justice.
God help us restore our country!

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Truth Month - July 2024 - Day 25 - Justice is supposed to be fairly applied - blind to status and impartial in judgment

 

Truth Month - July 2024


Day 25 - Justice is supposed to be fairly applied - blind to status and impartial in judgment

The well-known image of Lady Justice shows her with a blindfold covering her eyes and holding a scale.  The expectation is that justice will be weighed fairly and applied in the same way to everyone regardless of their status, character, or wealth.  When justice is not uniformly applied, then confidence is lost in fair outcomes.  This applies both to the wealthy as well as to the poor, to those in power and to those who are not, and to those of high reputation as well as to those with a criminal past.


It should be distressing to all when we see that this is not the case.  


  • When protestors of disfavored movements are targeted with extreme charges and sentences, while favored groups who burned and looted businesses, for example, are not even charged

  • When political leaders are targeted with "unique" interpretations of laws that have rarely/never been prosecuted before or applied in this manner just to "get" someone

  • When violent criminals are either not arrested or immediately released because they are poor/oppressed and are not even required to post bail

  • When disproportionate fines are levied against individuals, especially who can't afford to defend themselves against either the government or corporations with deep pockets

  • When judges appear to be biased in favor of certain cultural or political agendas and prejudicially rule consistently against one side

  • When judges limit the free speech of one party, but does not gag the other, in the name of safety and fairness

  • When judges have clear conflicts of interest and known biases, but refuse to admit it and recuse themselves

  • When the political party in power weaponizes the full power of the government to find crimes against their opponents

  • When judges effectively make laws by fiat instead of properly interpreting existing ones as intended

  • When justices refuse to "get involved" in controversial cases that might result in them losing popularity at social gatherings


When this happens, confidence in the integrity of the courts is diminished and lost.  Lady Justice should not tip the scales to achieve predetermined outcomes of equity, social justice, and discrimination at the expense of truth, real justice, and the laws of our constitutional republic.


Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Ooh ... A Venn Diagram

 


Here's a fun "unofficial" Venn Diagram of the 2024 Presidential race. 

Just remember, Kamala is fond of saying I Love Venn Diagrams  

Monday, July 22, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 22 Jul 2024 - Assassination Denier

 

Assassination Denier

The Ministry of Truth is adamant that no such thing is possible, since it was obviously staged.  Claims of close calls without a dead body are just fake news.  Clearly fake blood, faked deaths, and lack of panic prove this was a false flag event by opponents of Big Brother.  There also is no motive, since media, political, and legal assassinations have already proven effective at stopping or slowing the opposition from destroying our country, … right ?!? 

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Wednesday, July 17, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 17 Jul 2024 - Slippery Slope

 

Slippery Slope

Unsafe locations for Secret Service (SS) snipers, since they might fall off and be injured (per their leader).  Given the safety factors, no potential assassin would be willing to take such a risk either, so the location must be secure.  Besides, securing such a rooftop would be a provocative act, potentially sliding into more violence because of the threat of guns.  The SS is tasked with primarily protecting Big Brother and his administration from all threats, whether political, media-based, or physical. 
Note: Given resource constraints, greasing the roof was considered too much hassle. 

More info: 
Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Monday, July 15, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 15 Jul 2024 - Political Violence

 

Political Violence

Big Brother and the Ministry of Truth strongly decry actions taken against current government institutions or its officials.  However, meaningful (and mostly peaceful) protests, hyperbolic incitement to action, symbolic destruction of unapproved history, and inflammatory rhetoric are tacitly encouraged and protected for those supporting progressive causes.  BB's power must be shielded from usurpers, by any means necessary, since the enemies of democracy are evil, dangerous, existential threats to the planet, and authoritarian dictators who will destroy our country if allowed to take power.  Remember, our honored leader told us, "It’s time to put [the former dictator] in a bullseye."

More info: 

Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Thursday, July 4, 2024

Truth, Lies, and Politics

 

Truth, Lies, and Politics


We live in a postmodern world where often "truth" is just a label used to justify one's position or to smear another's by claiming that their truths are just lies.  We hear people talk about "their truth" or claim "That is just true to you, but not to me", as if truth is just a matter of opinion with no basis in reality.  How about some clarity?

Truth

Truth is that which corresponds to reality.  This includes actual events, actions taken, and objective facts.  It does not include claimed motivations, or whether one thinks something is good or evil.  It is not subjective truth, which is really nothing more than preference or opinion. 

Lies

Lies are a deliberate, intentional distortions of the truth intended to mislead others.  A difference in opinion or assignment of blame is not a lie.  Philosophical viewpoints that one disagrees with are not lies either.  To lie, one must knowingly tell an untruth with the intent to deceive.

Rhetoric

Rhetoric is the art of how one persuasively engages in debate or speech.  This can include exaggerations, ridicule, bragging, or using extreme examples (i.e. reductio ad absurdum) to make a point.  Saying "Everything my opponent said is a lie" is really not a lie, but it is a tactic.  Likewise fear-mongering to motivate one's base is a tactic used to scare people into accepting a position or candidate.

Media

The modern media has a lot of power, since many people only get their information from the mainstream media.  They have been rightly criticized for being unabashedly biased toward progressive agendas and liberal viewpoints.  In many ways, they are the embodiment of 1984's Ministry of Truth.  They tip the scales by biased reporting, MDM (mis-, dis-, mal-) information labeling, one-sided fact-checking, gaslighting to hide the truth, selective reporting, and even redefining words to support their agendas.  
 

Opinions

Differences of (political) opinion and perspectives are not necessarily lies!  Even if the following are objectionable, debatable, or misleading, they are not lies:
  • Belief in who was responsible for the security situation prior to/during the riot at the capital. 
  • Claims about what the position of each party is on various issues (e.g. abortion limits or lack thereof). 
  • Blame for who is responsible for the current immigration situation -- whether it is ultimately good/bad, the integrity of the vetting process, the demographics of border crossers, and the level of danger from it. 
  • Why inflation happened and who was responsible.
  • Who gets the credit or blame for the economic situation?
  • How the status of America in world standing has been affected by different presidents.  Is it respect or is it embarrassment?
  • Who caused or got us into wars?  Did they enable it, show weakness, or even enable/pay off terrorists?
  • Who will actually destroy "democracy" if elected?  Strictly speaking, do we even have a true democracy or is it actually a constitutional representative republic?
So the next time you hear one side or the other claim that the other is only telling lies, it might be a good idea to push back and actually ask them what they mean by that.

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 25 Jun 2024 - Presidential Debate

 

Presidential Debate

Opportunity for the Ministry of Truth media to expose illegitimate candidates, by limiting and controlling their MDM lies.  By bypassing the nonpartisan debate commission, they can achieve their primary goal of protecting Big Brother from attacks, by using "completely fair and unbiased" moderators.

More info: 

Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Wednesday, June 19, 2024

No, Karen, America is not a Democracy!

 


No, Karen, America is not a Democracy!

But wait, the liberal media constantly tells us that we are a democracy and that the evil insurrectionists are out to destroy it.  Well, surprise!  Once again the mainstream media is gaslighting by telling you that you must believe something that is actually not so.

The United States of America was founded as a Constitutional Republic in which elected representatives of the various states make decisions, promise to defend the Constitution, and to govern the country faithfully -- with checks and balances.  Our representatives are selected via a democratic process, which consists of one vote per eligible citizen (properly registered and verified).  A pure democracy is one in which a bare majority rules over the minority (e.g. 50.01% can vote to take all the money from the other 49.99%).  Note: the electoral college was setup in view of this reality, to protect our system of government from rash public opinion and mob rule.  

Generally the right to vote is contingent on meeting certain eligibility requirements.  These include: 
  • being a citizen of the United States 
  • being a valid resident of the appropriate country/state/locality 
  • being of legal age (generally 18 years of age) 
  • and to be legally registered to vote by the established deadline(s).  
The right to vote is for eligible citizens, not just residents or those otherwise in the country, legally or not.  You do not have the right to vote multiple ballots for the same election, after death, or for another person.  When political groups refuse to enforce identity verification or other reasonable voting checks and balances, one has to wonder "Why?"  

To challenge illegal voting methods and irregularities is not insurrection.  Rather it is a right, and really an obligation, to 
  • challenge questionable election tactics and violations of law
  • file legal challenges to illegal changes to voting laws and practices
  • demand effective partisan and nonpartisan poll watchers and fully open ballot counting
  • require verified chain of custody of ballots and all voting systems 
  • insist on objective and effective recounts, when deemed necessary
  • expect the government to aggressively go after and look for voter fraud, instead of just allowing them to claim that there is nothing to see 
  • object to election certifications when there is credible evidence of fraud or irregularities
All of the above are rights and responsibilities under our system of government.  However, the real danger to our system of government lies in the abuse of power by those who are supposed to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.  

We are currently living in such dangerous times. 

When courts judicially make laws and rulings that usurp powers constitutionally granted to other branches of government -- we are in danger!  When a president, or his executive branch, bypasses Congress and effectively implements laws by fiat -- we are in danger!  When members of Congress make expedient or political decisions, or fight among themselves, rather than acting in our best interest -- we are in danger!  When a Commander in Chief cannot effectively govern and lets radical extremists make policy and implement regulations -- we are in danger!  When the judicial system is abused and used to persecute political enemies, and lawfare is allowed to run unchecked -- we are in danger!  

So when you are gaslighted by claims that a change in leadership would lead to totalitarianism, and hear the Karens scream that the end of "Democracy" is coming, realize that they are just really looking in the mirror and fear their loss of power and control.  

It is time for a change!


Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 28 May 2024 - Entryism

 

Entryism

 A far-right secret strategy of actively joining into the mainstream political process and trying to take over local non-progressive groups.  This has been exposed by agents for the Ministry of Truth, who now fear retaliation from these extremists because they doxxed and exposed them.  How dare they participate in our sacred domain and attempt to impose their beliefs and MDM falsehoods into politics?

More info: 
Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Monday, May 6, 2024

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 06 May 2024 - Communication Strategy

 

Communication Strategy

To maintain the optimal narrative, political candidates should avoid interviews and skip debates, which can be spun as beneath them and wastes of time.  Carefully crafted talking points should be disseminated via surrogates and Ministry of Truth outlets, allowing the campaigns to control the narratives from their basement and behind the curtains. 

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary (Recent) (A-L) (M-Z)

Monday, October 16, 2023

Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 16 Oct 2023 - Best and Brightest

 


Best and Brightest
In a candid moment of insight, a political leader spoke their truth.  "America is not sending their best and brightest, you know, to Washington, D.C.," opined this top debater and rising progressive star, who has completely overcome his stroke-induced cognitive disabilities to lead reforms in Senate dress codes.

More info:   

Newspeak Dictionary Recent A-L M-Z FAQ