Saturday, August 31, 2024
Ministry of Truth Timely Update - 31 Aug 2024 - Flip-Flopping
Friday, August 30, 2024
Ministry of Truth Just Kidding Update - 30 Aug 2024 - Cooling Poverty
Cooling Poverty
Thursday, August 29, 2024
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 29 Aug 2024 - Border Czar
Border Czar
Wednesday, August 28, 2024
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 28 Aug 2024 - IOC Women
IOC Women
Tuesday, August 27, 2024
Ministry of Truth Timely Update - 27 Aug 2024 - Free Speech Absolutist Weirdos
Free Speech Absolutist Weirdos
- facilitate criminal activity,
- plot terrorism,
- sell guns,
- spread disinformation,
- organize dissent,
- recruit others,
- seed malign influence, or
- talk about government dissatisfaction
- social media,
- encrypted apps,
- private emails,
- telegrams,
- morse code,
- disappearing ink,
- whispered conversations,
- passed notes,
- strings and cans,
- smoke signals, and
- anything else that the Ministry of Truth deems to be "bad".
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 27 Aug 2024 - Racist-fluid
A more descriptive term for those who are not antisemitic, but just pro-Hamas and pro-Hezbollah. This view is implicitly encouraged by Big Brother and surrogates, due to its ambiguity. "Freedom is Slavery" to the benevolent religious rule of the jihadist freedom fighters, who are willing to temporarily use sympathizers, even if they typically would be killed and persecuted because of their sexual preferences and lifestyles.
Monday, August 26, 2024
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 26 Aug 2024 - Unburdened
Unburdened
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipeaczmRACA
- https://www.tiktok.com/@jacobcanfield/video/7394169516000824582
Friday, August 23, 2024
A Stone in the Shoe
A Stone in the Shoe
In any apologetic conversation, the goal should be Truth and Clarity, not necessarily agreement. Real tolerance allows for healthy disagreement about ideas and beliefs, not all of which are true, good, or thought out. This includes direct challenges to bad ideas without attacking the person.
Asking (Columbo) questions to guide a conversation serves to
give clarification of what is believed
gather information, find inconsistencies or weakness
provoke thought with leading questions, making a point, or expose logic flaws
define their terms by asking, "What do you mean by that?"
challenge them to explain their reasoning (i.e. their narrative), "How did you come to that conclusion?"
draw out or expose the consequences of their beliefs, if true or not (e.g. "So what does that imply, or what should be done?")
The end goal is not an immediate "win", but rather to put a stone in their shoe so that they go away feeling uncomfortable with some aspect of their view. Realize too that others may be listening. Your conversation is for them too, not just those in the discussion proper. The hope is to get them (and ourselves) to come to know what we believe and why.
Ministry of Truth Just Kidding Update - 23 Aug 2024 - Hypergamy
Hypergamy
Thursday, August 22, 2024
Book Review - Set Apart - Genesis Stands Alone
Book Review
Set Apart
How Genesis Stands Alone
- Monotheism, One God who is ontologically distinct from His creation
- Linear view of history, which is advancing according to His eternal plan
- Contingent creation from nothing by God's Word (ex nihilo), using the Hebrew word bara in several places when something new came into existence
- View that humans were uniquely created in God's image and have intrinsic value and worth
- Claim that the Creation was originally created as good and serves as His General Revelation to all peoples
- Telling of the True Myth, as C.S. Lewis once noted
- Sometimes poetic and figurative language usage to describe actual history
- Grounding of ethics and morals as revelation from God
- is written as a historical narrative, using literal, poetic, and figurative language as needed
- is theo-history, not mytho-history
- presents a distinct linear Hebrew cosmology and origin story
- is Monotheistic, unlike the surrounding cultures
- describes a contingent material world, created by God's command
Just like our God, it is one of a kind!
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 22 Aug 2024 - Decrim
Decrim
Wednesday, August 21, 2024
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 21 Aug 2024 - Bail Funds
Bail Funds
Tuesday, August 20, 2024
Anti-Zionism Response
Response to Anti-Zionism
First, just because you can find certain words in the Bible, does not mean that you can rightly apply them to anything you want. Context always matters and a good principle to follow is to Never read a Bible verse. To take the "synagogue of Satan" reference in the Book of Revelation, which is in the context of "letters" to the churches in Smyrna and Philadelphia contemporary to the apostle John (Revelation 2 & 3), and then claim that this directly references any modern group of people is not in any way sound biblical interpretation. To further claim that this means that anyone labeled as a "fake Jew" is Satanic, is also without merit. What is the purpose in literally demonizing any group of people?
It is truly ironic that the term anti-Zionist is being used as a shield against being called anti-Jewish or antisemitic. Referenced many times in the Bible, Zion was known as the City of God, and was a place of refuge for God's people, even when the majority refused to follow Him. It also was used as a reference for God's people, His spiritual kingdom, the temple mount, and literally the city of Jerusalem ("Zion of the Holy One of Israel"). In some ways, this is even a more apt description of the purpose of the state of Israel than some others.
God's people have often been a remnant and not the majority, as previously discussed. But even if the majority are so-called "fake Jews", then so what? There are plenty of cultural and unfaithful "in name only" Christians too, probably in our own churches. By implication, does that really prove that there are no real Jews in today's Israel? There are scientific studies (one, two, three, and more), in respected peer-reviewed journals, that show significant middle-eastern genetic relationships among these multiple groups who claim Jewish ancestry and who have moved to Israel. Peer-reviewed journals such as Science conclude that evidence firmly establishes that Ashkenazi Jews “stem from a common Middle Eastern origin and heritage.” The 20 co-authors of the study in Human Biology confirm that Ashkenazi Jews “derive [shared Jewish genetic markers] primarily from populations of the Middle East and Europe.” In addition, people who weaponize this hypothesis to discredit the Jewish claim to the land of Israel should note that Ashkenazi Jews do not make up the majority of Israel’s Jewish population. According to a 2016 Pew Research report, only about 45% of Israeli Jews identify as Ashkenazi, while 48% identify as Sephardic or Mizrahi.
So it needs to be asked,
How did you come to that conclusion that modern Jews have no ancestral connection to God's Chosen people?
Who taught this and why?
What is the source and motivation behind these claims, and should they be promoted?
Even if it was true, and that has not been established, what is your conclusion and takeaway?
For example saying that the "Jews killed Jesus", that Israel is composed of pedophiles, that they are genocidal, or claiming that even today these fake Jews go around killing Christians, echoes claims also widely made by many hate groups including the Nation of Islam (Louis Farrakhan), Islamic mullahs, some white supremacists, Nazis (the original flavor and neo-), some "christian" militia groups, and ranting social media attention-seekers, to just name a few. Is it wise to also endorse an ideology that they created or still promulgate? It should at least give pause and prompt self-reflection to ask what the larger agenda is, and then to consider why these claims should be promoted.
To publicly associate yourself (or any religious or patriotic group you belong to) with these unsupported claims will ruin any influence you hope to have in our society and will destroy any internal unity that was hard won. Right or wrong, the perception will be that you are pushing an agenda of hate and anti-Semitism, instead of constitutional values and the rights of the people. Read that again, "perception", so you don't misunderstand me, as I trust that most people here don't actually harbor hate. But even if you were 100% right, strategically this is a bad move.
Note: the geopolitical nature of this regional conflict, especially in light of radical Islamic regimes, is another discussion altogether. Perhaps one or both sides have made bad choices based on hate or fear. War is horrible, but sometimes unavoidable when it arrives at your doorstep. I assume all people of good will want a lasting peace, but at what cost?
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 20 Aug 2024 - Project 1985
Project 1985
Monday, August 19, 2024
Ministry of Truth Daily Update - 19 Aug 2024 - Circumlocution
Circumlocution
Friday, August 16, 2024
What About Israel?
What About Israel?
TLDR
God's Chosen People were given the Promised Land by YHWH, the great I Am.
They have had historical and verifiable occupation in the Promised Land for thousands of years.
God revealed Himself through Moses and established a covenant religious system (Yahwism or Judaism), promising a Messiah.
Many times God's people rebelled, were punished and scattered, and then eventually returned.
Wars have consequences, and the land today called Israel was set aside by the victorious Allies of WWII as a Jewish state in their ancestral lands.
Even from a secular perspective, doesn't a people or a nation have the right to exist and defend itself from threats?
God's Chosen People were given the Promised Land by YHWH, the great I Am.
These people were the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (aka Israel), and have been variously known as children of Abraham, Hebrews, Jews, Israelites, "Jacob", "Israel", and Judeans in scripture and historical references.
14 The Lord said to Abram after Lot had parted from him, “Look around from where you are, to the north and south, to the east and west. 15 All the land that you see I will give to you and your offspring forever. (Genesis 13:14–15)
I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! For I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham,[a] a member of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew… (Romans 11:1)
Then say to them, Thus says the Lord God: Behold, I will take the people of Israel from the nations among which they have gone, and will gather them from all around, and bring them to their own land. And I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel. And one king shall be king over them all, and they shall be no longer two nations, and no longer divided into two kingdoms. (Ezekiel 37:21-22)
While these are a few good examples, this is far from an exhaustive list!
The people of God (aka YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah) were also called "Israel", as descendants of Jacob (Israel), as well as both the land and the kingdom bearing this name. So historically Israel is a people, but also a nation, and also known as the land of the people of God. Note: For a while, the northern kingdom was called Israel (southern Judah) after Solomon. Even in Jesus' time these people were called by a variety of names, including Israelites and Jews.
They have had historical and verifiable occupation in the Promised Land for thousands of years
YHWH's people have had historical and documented occupation in the Promised Land for thousands of years, but not always continuous due to exile and diaspora, invasions, religious wars, and persecutions. This land has been called by many names: Judah, Israel, Judea, Palestine, but "a rose by any other name" … it is still the Promised Land given to His Chosen People. Archeology verifies this, the Bible testifies to this, and history includes this reality.
God revealed Himself through Moses and established a covenant religious system (Yahwism or Judaism), promising a Messiah.
From the very moment that Moses brought the 10 Commandments down for his people, some believed and followed, and some rebelled. God revealed to Moses a system of belief and practice to follow; one where they could have their sins forgiven and look forward to a Savior. As time went along, these followers were not just people of blood descent, but were also included by being grafted in through faith, inter-marriage, and conversion. Sadly, there are also many who have been pruned out because of their unfaithfulness. (See Romans ch. 11)
Many times God's people rebelled, were punished and scattered, and then eventually returned.
The Bible makes reference to the 12 Tribes of Israel in end-times prophecy, and there is no indication that they ceased to exist after the Church was founded by Jesus and the Temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. They were exiled and scattered (i.e. the diaspora) because they were apostate, rejecting their God (and Messiah) for others, but yet returned to the land where the temple was built and rebuilt more than once.
Many of today's Jews follow a form of historical Judaism, including using the Torah and the Prophets. Many of these people have family lineages that they claim are historically Jewish. As Christians, we should realize that genetic lineage is not the only thing that makes a child of Abraham, but rather faith. There are many cases of people being grafted into the Jewish family, including some in Jesus' own family tree. There is also cultural Judaism, just like social Christianity, Latin American Catholicism, etc. As far as I can tell, the modern state of Israel welcomes all who claim to be Jewish.
Note: Even in NT times, the Jews were not the real enemy, but they were lost sheep in need of their Savior. (See Romans 11:28). It should be noted that many Jews were some of his most devoted followers from the beginning. The political classes and temple leaders with power to lose were the actual threat. In Christ, however, all believers are grafted into God's family. While it may not be everyone's intent, saying that "the Jews murdered Jesus", has historically been used to demonize and persecute them. I believe that it is very unwise and unfair to repeat that without good context.
Wars have consequences, and the land today called Israel was set aside by the victorious Allies of WWII.
All nations are creations of men, generally through conflict. Israel was created in response to a terrible evil committed against those identifying as Jews. This is their ancestral home. The patriarchs, prophets, Jesus, the apostles, and the majority of his early followers (and many enemies) all lived in the Promised Land, which is the area we now call Israel. This is faithfully recorded in the New Testament, and is supported by historical records and archeology. The victors of WWII chose to form Israel as a sanctuary, and to right a great wrong.
So Israel was created as a Jewish state in their ancestral lands, in view of the atrocities of the Holocaust against the Jews. Our nation was a part of this decision and our responsibility. They are surrounded by Islamic nations who resent it and want to destroy it. It has been under attack from its very inception, while most of the inhabitants want to live in peace at home and with their Muslim neighbors. Historically Jews have been widely persecuted, but still held to a religious and cultural identity, based on traditions and scripture.
Even from a secular perspective, doesn't a people or a nation have the right to exist and defend itself from threats?
Looking in the mirror, it seems like I recall other countries (like ours) that have done that from time to time.
This generation's conflict is primarily a war against radical jihadist Islam. They want us (the Satans) eradicated. Radical Islam is at war with Western civilization and Christianity, to the extent that Christians cannot freely or safely enter some of our most holy sites. In this, we are practical allies with the state of Israel, one of the few democratically elected governments in that region. While it is in many ways a decadent, secular state (like the US), it does allow the co-existence of other religions, unlike many of its neighbors.
It should be noted that Israel has nukes. Any uncontrolled war will result in nuclear war if the Islamists try to literally wipe them off the map. We should all strive for a lasting peace, but that has rarely come by appeasement of evil. There is a moral difference in war between targeted attacks on civilians, and those killed while attacking the enemy, which is not a genocide, despite claims to the contrary. When the children are no longer taught to hate and kill their neighbors, then peace can come.
To be clear, I don't believe that we should "blindly" support them, but should we stand by and allow them to be destroyed? In my opinion, and that of many others, if the Islamic terrorists would lay down their arms, then there would be peace. If Israel lays down their arms, then they will cease to exist, i.e. a real genocide. We need to be strategic partners, who can give them honest and blunt feedback and advice, not back-stabbers.
How about a little thought (gedanken) experiment? If we were under the same attacks here, how would we respond? With WWII atomic bombs, bombing of whole cities in Germany, or the post 9-11 War on Terror, so it would seem. Was everything done possible to mitigate collateral damage that we could? Who really knows? But I am sure that we would not tolerate daily missiles launched into Orlando from Cuba, would we?
See also Anti-Zionism and Who is a Jew?